dmitrii-guzhanin-istockphoto-com-scales--1

Dmitrii_Guzhanin / iStockphoto.com

15 November 2018Big Pharma

Warner-Lambert v Actavis ‘disappointing’ for innovators: lawyers

The UK Supreme Court’s decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis is disappointing for pharmaceutical innovators, and enforcing second medical use patents may now be more challenging, lawyers have told LSIPR.

Already registered?

Login to your account

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

UK Supreme Court issues Warner-Lambert v Actavis ruling

14 November 2018 The UK Supreme Court today dismissed Warner-Lambert’s appeal in its pregabalin patent dispute with Actavis, while clarifying the role of plausibility in the sufficiency of patent applications.

Warner-Lambert v Actavis: a summary from the UK Supreme Court hearing

21 February 2018 Infringement and plausibility were the biggest issues on the battleground in the UK Supreme Court’s hearing in a case dealing with second medical use patents, as Claire Phipps-Jones, Katie Cambrook and Rachel Mumby of Bristows report.

More on this story

UK Supreme Court issues Warner-Lambert v Actavis ruling

14 November 2018 The UK Supreme Court today dismissed Warner-Lambert’s appeal in its pregabalin patent dispute with Actavis, while clarifying the role of plausibility in the sufficiency of patent applications.

Warner-Lambert v Actavis: a summary from the UK Supreme Court hearing

21 February 2018 Infringement and plausibility were the biggest issues on the battleground in the UK Supreme Court’s hearing in a case dealing with second medical use patents, as Claire Phipps-Jones, Katie Cambrook and Rachel Mumby of Bristows report.

More on this story

UK Supreme Court issues Warner-Lambert v Actavis ruling

14 November 2018 The UK Supreme Court today dismissed Warner-Lambert’s appeal in its pregabalin patent dispute with Actavis, while clarifying the role of plausibility in the sufficiency of patent applications.

Warner-Lambert v Actavis: a summary from the UK Supreme Court hearing

21 February 2018 Infringement and plausibility were the biggest issues on the battleground in the UK Supreme Court’s hearing in a case dealing with second medical use patents, as Claire Phipps-Jones, Katie Cambrook and Rachel Mumby of Bristows report.

More features

President Trump 2.0: Five major areas to watch

Sandoz lands reduced antitrust award of $70m

New president’s to-do list: Patent bills, non-competes, USPTO director?

Sanofi subsidiary fends off $450m trade secrets case

Regulatory expert joins White & Case

Teva faces $500m fine for antitrust breaches over MS drug

UK Budget: A missed opportunity?

Pfizer infringed haemophilia therapy patent, says court