In a long series of judgments and orders, starting with the Medeva case, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has given guidance on the exact requirements for the grant of supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for medicinal products in the EU. It seems that the matter is finally settling after last December’s judgments in the Actavis, Georgetown II and Eli Lilly cases, in a manner that appears generally acceptable, but that may not be the case when it comes to biologicals.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
27 August 2026 As China-origin biotech assets flood the market, licensing deals are booming. Yet, the real strategic battle isn't just about the science—it’s about who controls the underlying IP, says Paul Calvo of Sterne Kessler
17 August 2026 Europe’s biotechnology challenge is not only whether it can fund innovation. It is whether it can continue to originate and control the foundational IP positions from which future biotech value is created. Paul Calvo of Sterne Kessler explains.