Natera loses $96m jury win as judge invalidates DNA test patents
Delaware federal judge reverses jury verdict in CareDx’s favour | Natera’s patents covering organ transplant testing technology found invalid | Natera also faces separate trade secrets claims from Guardant Health over cancer blood tests.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
14 November 2024 Michael Summersgill and his co-counsel at WilmerHale secured more favourable outcomes for their clients than others in a series of lawsuits brought by Ravgen over pre-natal screening tests, he tells Sarah Speight.
14 November 2024 Michael Summersgill and his co-counsel at WilmerHale secured more favourable outcomes for their clients than others in a series of lawsuits brought by Ravgen over pre-natal screening tests, he tells Sarah Speight.
14 November 2024 Michael Summersgill and his co-counsel at WilmerHale secured more favourable outcomes for their clients than others in a series of lawsuits brought by Ravgen over pre-natal screening tests, he tells Sarah Speight.