Photo: Courtesy of Eli Lilly
4 April 2017Big Pharma
UK Supreme Court hears Eli Lilly dispute with Actavis
A five-year dispute between Eli Lilly and Actavis over a cancer drug is being heard today at the UK Supreme Court.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
Big Pharma
7 July 2017 The UK Supreme Court has ruled that Actavis’s generic versions of cancer drug Alimta directly infringe patents owned by Eli Lilly, reversing two earlier decisions.
Big Pharma
12 July 2017 The UK Supreme Court has reformulated the three questions that should be asked when testing for equivalent patent infringement.
Editor's picks
Editor's picks
Big Pharma
7 July 2017 The UK Supreme Court has ruled that Actavis’s generic versions of cancer drug Alimta directly infringe patents owned by Eli Lilly, reversing two earlier decisions.
Big Pharma
12 July 2017 The UK Supreme Court has reformulated the three questions that should be asked when testing for equivalent patent infringement.
Big Pharma
7 July 2017 The UK Supreme Court has ruled that Actavis’s generic versions of cancer drug Alimta directly infringe patents owned by Eli Lilly, reversing two earlier decisions.
Big Pharma
12 July 2017 The UK Supreme Court has reformulated the three questions that should be asked when testing for equivalent patent infringement.