30 April 2013AmericasJames Monroe and Lawrence Ilag
Obviousness of DNA fragments in the post-Kubin era
Four years ago, the Federal Circuit held in In re Kubin, 561 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2009) that the claimed polynucleotide (DNA) sequences in that case were obvious, although the prior art did not disclose or suggest what the claimed sequences would look like. In effect, the Federal Circuit found the sequences obvious because the prior art disclosed sufficient information to make isolating and characterising the claimed DNA sequences a rather straightforward project.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
25 February 2026 The Danish company is contending with fierce competition, a clinical trial setback and a UK boost to its main rival, while making new moves to enforce its weight-loss-drug IP.
20 February 2026 The German biotech claims the newly approved vaccine infringes its mRNA patent, deepening an already complex feud with billions of dollars at stake.
19 February 2026 An EPO appeals board has denied Boston Scientific’s bid to revoke St Jude Medical’s transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patent, but declined to hand a complete victory to the patent owner.