scientist-labcoat-dna
30 April 2013AmericasJames Monroe and Lawrence Ilag

Obviousness of DNA fragments in the post-Kubin era

Four years ago, the Federal Circuit held in In re Kubin, 561 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2009) that the claimed polynucleotide (DNA) sequences in that case were obvious, although the prior art did not disclose or suggest what the claimed sequences would look like. In effect, the Federal Circuit found the sequences obvious because the prior art disclosed sufficient information to make isolating and characterising the claimed DNA sequences a rather straightforward project.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
4 June 2026   Justices refuse to place generic drug makers “between a rock and a hard place,” in a landmark ruling clarifying induced patent infringement in pharma.
Americas
3 June 2026   A district court has thrown out one challenge over the vaccine delivery technology, while a separate appeal could affect protections available to government contractors during national emergencies.
Americas
1 June 2026   A district jury has handed a J&J unit a clean sweep in its defence against a rival's heart pump patent claims, delivering a win under the seldom-invoked reverse doctrine of equivalents.