William Barton / Shutterstock.com
29 January 2025NewsAmericasMuireann Bolger

GSK seeks damages hike in ‘skinny label’ case

Complex legal battle concerns ‘skinny label’ strategy used by generic drug makers, prompting a $235 million award | Pharma giant looks for enhanced damages due to ‘wilful infringement’, while opponent wants another trial.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
16 May 2023   The US Supreme Court knocks back Teva’s challenge to GSK’s damages win | Decision issued despite US solicitor general warning that the earlier decision ‘threatens significant harm’ to the market.
Big Pharma
23 May 2023   Despite one judge’s insistence that the case was “narrow and fact dependent”, GSK v Teva could have wide-reaching implications for generic drugs, biosimilars, and how skinny labels are read, say Chad Landmon, Ross Blau, Gulrukh Haroon of Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider.

More on this story

article
16 May 2023   The US Supreme Court knocks back Teva’s challenge to GSK’s damages win | Decision issued despite US solicitor general warning that the earlier decision ‘threatens significant harm’ to the market.
Big Pharma
23 May 2023   Despite one judge’s insistence that the case was “narrow and fact dependent”, GSK v Teva could have wide-reaching implications for generic drugs, biosimilars, and how skinny labels are read, say Chad Landmon, Ross Blau, Gulrukh Haroon of Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider.

More on this story

article
16 May 2023   The US Supreme Court knocks back Teva’s challenge to GSK’s damages win | Decision issued despite US solicitor general warning that the earlier decision ‘threatens significant harm’ to the market.
Big Pharma
23 May 2023   Despite one judge’s insistence that the case was “narrow and fact dependent”, GSK v Teva could have wide-reaching implications for generic drugs, biosimilars, and how skinny labels are read, say Chad Landmon, Ross Blau, Gulrukh Haroon of Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider.