Video interview: Taylor Wessing on SPCs at the CJEU
There have been two significant references on issues that have been "left hanging" by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the last spate of decisions, says Paul England, senior associate at Taylor Wessing, in a video interview with LSIPR. England discusses the two important references to the CJEU with regard to supplementary protection certificates. Here he covers the Teva v Gilead Sciences and Abraxis Bioscience references, and talks about the importance of these cases.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
7 September 2026 A single phrase in a patent has proved decisive in Biofer’s infringement fight with Vifor, with the Federal Circuit exposing the risks of small claim-drafting choices for life sciences companies.
27 August 2026 Turkish regulators are investigating the drugmaker over its efforts to protect its drug from generic rivals—conduct that may sound familiar to European competition watchers.
21 August 2026 Under the terms of the agreement, which resolves all patent litigation between the biopharma rivals, Teva now has a launch date for its own version of Aurinia's Lupkynis.