Minerva: less risk for inventors, more work for the courts

The US Supreme Court opinion in Minverva v Hologic means that inventors will now have a far narrower scope to be able to challenge the validity of their own patents in defence proceedings—a decision that was controversial among the judges.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Pharma

USPTO director steps into Sun Pharma’s PTAB-ITC clash

31 July 2026 A director review has overturned a PTAB ruling, questioning why it diverged from an ITC decision based on the same patent claims, prior art and evidence.

Pharma

Pharmascience v Janssen: Canada court updates methods of medical treatment protection

23 July 2026 Canada has firmly slammed the door on patenting methods of medical treatment—but the battle over what counts as a "medical method" is only just beginning. Scott MacKendrick of ROBIC examines a landmark decision that leaves the door ajar for future litigation over complex drug-dosing regimens.

Pharma

Exelixis opens two-front patent dispute over Cabometyx copies

9 July 2026 Separate lawsuits target Indian and Taiwanese pharma companies as Exelixis seeks to keep rival cabozantinib products off the US market until key patents expire.