boule-shutterstock-com-cherry-
Boule / Shutterstock.com
24 March 2016PharmaJoachim Wachenfeld and Oswin Ridderbusch

A second bite at the cherry

Second medical use claims have a long-standing history in European Patent Office (EPO) case law. As is well known, the first ever decision of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal confirmed the patentability of second medical use claims when written in the so-called Swiss-type format. The Enlarged Board in that 1984 decision, G5/83, held that protection was available for “specified new and inventive therapeutic application[s]”. In the years that followed the technical boards of appeal controversially discussed what exactly was meant by the “specified therapeutic applications” referred to by the Enlarged Board.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Pharma
10 September 2026   Four patents stood firm in a Johnson & Johnson unit’s fight with Sandoz, leaving the generics maker facing a lengthy wait before its esketamine nasal spray can reach the US market.
Pharma
7 September 2026   A single phrase in a patent has proved decisive in Biofer’s infringement fight with Vifor, with the Federal Circuit exposing the risks of small claim-drafting choices for life sciences companies.
Pharma
27 August 2026   Turkish regulators are investigating the drugmaker over its efforts to protect its drug from generic rivals—conduct that may sound familiar to European competition watchers.