ivan-lukyanchuk-shutterstock-com
Ivan Lukyanchuk / Shutterstock.com
28 July 2016EuropeStephanie Pilkington and Ling Zhuang

EPO opposition reforms: the changing face of central patent revocation

Changes in July to opposition practice at the European Patent Office (EPO), as well as the decision of the Administrative Council (AC) of the EPO to reform the boards of appeal, reflect a common theme—the need for greater efficiency at the EPO. These reforms have occurred at a time of speculation about how the possible co-existence of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) alongside the established EPO opposition procedure will affect decision-making surrounding attacks on the validity of European patents.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Europe
16 February 2026   Following the UK Supreme Court’s recent landmark judgment, which ushers in a sea-change to patent law, the team behind a groundbreaking AI-related invention sit down with Sarah Speight to explain how they got here, and why the ruling changes everything.
Europe
12 February 2026   The court has denied a German non-practising entity’s bid to secure unitary protection for a patent that it has asserted against Intel.
Europe
12 February 2026   UK and European patent attorneys share their initial views after the UK Supreme Court delivered its landmark judgment, which “brings some much‑needed clarity and consistency” to the patentability of AI-related innovations—including those in the medtech industry.