Subscribe
tetiana-yurchenko-shutterstock-com
Tetiana Yurchenko / Shutterstock.com
29 June 2015Americas

US court says ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements do not need to involve cash

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements do not need to involve cash payments to be considered anticompetitive.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
FTC demands corrections in GSK, Teva pay-for-delay ruling
17 March 2016   The US Federal Trade Commission has urged a federal appeals court to correct errors in a judgment from a Pennsylvania court that found the plaintiff in a pay-for-delay case had failed to prove that the agreement breached US competition law.


Editor's picks

Americas
Amgen set for ‘at-risk’ launch of blockbuster eye drug biosimilar
24 October 2024

Editor's picks

Americas
Amgen set for ‘at-risk’ launch of blockbuster eye drug biosimilar
24 October 2024
Asia
President Xi sends message to AIPPI’s World Congress
22 October 2024
Unified Patent Court
‘Every CMS filing is painful’: Notes from a Unified Patent Court dispute
26 September 2024
Unified Patent Court
Interview: Klaus Grabinski, UPC Court of Appeal president
24 September 2024
Unified Patent Court
‘Be prepared, and don’t assume at the UPC’: Christopher Stothers
12 September 2024
Unified Patent Court
Does the UPC offer a fresh take on patent validity?
5 September 2024

More on this story

Americas
FTC demands corrections in GSK, Teva pay-for-delay ruling
17 March 2016   The US Federal Trade Commission has urged a federal appeals court to correct errors in a judgment from a Pennsylvania court that found the plaintiff in a pay-for-delay case had failed to prove that the agreement breached US competition law.

More on this story

Americas
FTC demands corrections in GSK, Teva pay-for-delay ruling
17 March 2016   The US Federal Trade Commission has urged a federal appeals court to correct errors in a judgment from a Pennsylvania court that found the plaintiff in a pay-for-delay case had failed to prove that the agreement breached US competition law.

More features

Kathi Vidal to leave USPTO ahead of incoming Trump administration
Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin in $2bn merger talks
Teva fights for re-listing of inhaler patents at US appeals court
CRISPR patents revoked following Nobel Prize winners’ withdrawal
White & Case hires experienced litigator from A&O Shearman
President Trump 2.0: Five major areas to watch
Startup CFO’s betrayal is a lesson in preparing for the worst
Sandoz lands reduced antitrust award of $70m