Subject matter eligibility: interpreting the USPTO guidelines

In March 4, 2014, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published examination guidelines designed to aid examiners in applying the principles of recent Supreme Court decisions addressing when inventions relating to laws of nature, natural phenomena, and natural products are eligible for patenting under 35 USC §101.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Americas

5 ways the USPTO director is changing US innovation

24 December 2025 John Squires has rewired the country’s patents system since becoming USPTO director—but which changes are most impactful? Sarah Speight explores.

Americas

Mirum targets generics in quartet of suits over liver treatment

22 December 2025 Biopharma company and two others have taken action against numerous defendants over proposed generic versions of Livmarli, Mirum’s core revenue driver.

Americas

SCOTUS shuts the door on Entresto ‘after-arising technology’ review

17 December 2025 The proponents of a petition denied by the Supreme Court said it addressed a conflict that was significant “not just for the pharmaceutical industry, but for all stakeholders in our patent system”.

More features

From Edwards to Insulet: Three key medical device cases of 2025

5 ways the USPTO director is changing US innovation

Mirum targets generics in quartet of suits over liver treatment

Hogan Lovells and Cadwalader strike historic deal to create $3.6bn firm

WATCH: Enabling success — overcoming §112 in the new era of life sciences patents

WATCH: “Try and see” – an underestimated standard for obviousness before the EPO?

Regeneron v Alvotech: The big impact

SCOTUS shuts the door on Entresto ‘after-arising technology’ review

Subject matter eligibility: interpreting the USPTO guidelines

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More features