27 September 2013Americas

Judge denies AstraZeneca’s bid to squash pay-for-delay challenge

A federal judge has denied AstraZeneca’s motions to dismiss claims challenging its pay-for-delay deals with three generic pharmaceutical companies in connection to heartburn drug Nexium.

Already registered?

Login to your account

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

US Supreme Court backs ‘rule-of-reason’ for pay-for-delay

17 June 2013 A majority of the US Supreme Court has ruled that the US Federal Trade Commission should be able to challenge so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ patent litigation settlements on antitrust grounds.

AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy win ‘pay-for-delay’ case

8 December 2014 A US court has spared drug companies AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy Laboratories a potentially hefty fine after ruling that a ‘pay-for-delay’ deal between them did not violate antitrust grounds.

More on this story

US Supreme Court backs ‘rule-of-reason’ for pay-for-delay

17 June 2013 A majority of the US Supreme Court has ruled that the US Federal Trade Commission should be able to challenge so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ patent litigation settlements on antitrust grounds.

AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy win ‘pay-for-delay’ case

8 December 2014 A US court has spared drug companies AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy Laboratories a potentially hefty fine after ruling that a ‘pay-for-delay’ deal between them did not violate antitrust grounds.

More on this story

US Supreme Court backs ‘rule-of-reason’ for pay-for-delay

17 June 2013 A majority of the US Supreme Court has ruled that the US Federal Trade Commission should be able to challenge so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ patent litigation settlements on antitrust grounds.

AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy win ‘pay-for-delay’ case

8 December 2014 A US court has spared drug companies AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy Laboratories a potentially hefty fine after ruling that a ‘pay-for-delay’ deal between them did not violate antitrust grounds.

More features

Bayer gains exclusive licence for heart drug in Japan

EPO delivers key Novo Nordisk, GSK and Inhibrx rulings

McGuireWoods expands team with ex-Novo Nordisk GC

Paul, Weiss swoops for senior duo from Weil, Gotshal

UPC bans Meril Life Sciences from selling infringing heart valve

SCOTUS denies Alvogen unit's appeal to sell Bausch Xifaxan generic

Kathi Vidal to rejoin previous firm as partner following USPTO departure

GSK triumphs in EPO appeal, revoking Pfizer patent