From profits to damages: Canada’s NIA defence

On July 23, 2015, in Apotex v Merck & Co, Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal found for the first time that the availability to an infringer of a non-infringing alternative (NIA) is a relevant consideration when calculating damages for patent infringement. This is a significant legal development.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Americas

Masimo convinces judge that Apple took secrets—but it’s not enough

19 March 2026 Although the court agreed that the tech giant misappropriated some of Masimo’s information related to pulse oximetry technology, Apple is not barred from using it, says a California judge.

Americas

J&J unit targets former employee over alleged mass data theft

17 March 2026 Janssen seeks injunctive relief after a forensic review uncovers mass downloads of trade secrets spanning oncology, neuroscience and immunology portfolios.

Americas

Six Summit takeaways: In-person IP, agentic AI and ‘infollution’ risks

12 March 2026 The event unpacked how technology, litigation trends, and global events are adding complexity while also offering benefits for legal teams under pressure to reduce costs.

More features

WIPR debuts Global In-House Elite 2026

mRNA litigation: Who’s winning, who’s filing, and what’s next

Dechert boosts litigation bench with partner duo

UK court deals blow to Spanish pharma’s SPC bid for contraceptive

EPO reports record patent filings, but pharma and biotech lag

Part II: The race to replace semaglutide heats up

Part I: Ozempic goes generic as Novo’s key patent expires

Masimo convinces judge that Apple took secrets—but it’s not enough

From profits to damages: Canada’s NIA defence

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More features